Today on A (Budding) Sociologist, we have a first (and one that vaguely contradicts the title of this blog): a guest post! Jeff Lundy is a PhD candidate at the University of California, San Diego, a visiting scholar at the University of Michigan, and a blogger at The Panhandler’s Guide. His dissertation focuses on the consumption patterns of Americans in the past few years, drawing on the absurdly detailed Consumer Expenditures Survey to analyze theories about overspending and luxury consumption. His post today, the first of two, is about a topic of frustration: why old people think the kids these days spend too much.
Why Everyone Younger Than You is Spoiled: the Foibles of Amateur Accounting
By Jeff Lundy
Sociologist Katherine Newman is working on a fascinating study of a new phenomenon called “delayed adulthood.” According to Newman, parents are bemoaning the extended amount of time their kids are taking to “grow up” in First World countries (e.g. U.S., Japan, Norway, Spain, etc.). Along with this phenomenon of “delayed adulthood,” Newman similarly finds media articles dotting the globe that discuss how parents regard their children as increasingly “spoiled.”
I can’t wait to read Newman’s book on this phenomenon when it comes out. However, from a personal standpoint, I think younger generations are already well aware that older generations (particularly boomers) think we’re a bunch of slackers. In fact, I’ve gotten so tired of hearing this from my elders that I’ve spent some time contemplating why older generations think us younger generations are so spoiled.
While there are many things that must feed into this complex phenomenon, I think that a major culprit here is our elders’ amateur financial accounting. In fact, I’ve isolated four main issues with the economic accounting of older generations that I believe leads them to think of us youth as spoiled (and which us youngins’ should remember for when we get older). To spare your attention span, I’m spreading the four issues over two posts. So if you want the exciting conclusion to this week’s post, you’ll have to come back next week.
Inflation
Inflation is a pretty familiar concept. We all know that things cost “more” now than they used to. Even in my short life I’ve seen the nominal price of using a payphone move from 25 cents to 50 cents. Dispensed sodas once were 50 cents, and now they are damn near $1.25. Still, despite everyone’s vague sense of increasing prices, few people (in any generation) actually have a strong grasp on what inflation is, or a specific idea on exactly how much things have changed over time.
As Dan has pointed out in previous posts, the exact way to measure inflation is questionable, primarily because it’s a diffuse phenomenon with a number of different causes. Still, the Bureau of Labor Statistics does the best it can to track it. And using the BLS inflation calculator as a reference point, we can see the first factor that leads older generations to go wrong: discounting inflation.
Why is Inflation Accounting a Problem for Older Generations?
Take a classic example. My soon-to-be mother-in-law has offered to fund part of my upcoming wedding. I am very grateful for her contribution. However, like any good boomer she cannot help but point out how “exorbitantly” priced our wedding is, and just how “spoiled” we are. She loves to point out, on many occasions, that “all her parents ever gave her was $900 for her wedding.”
$900 does sound pretty reasonable compared to the nearly $3,000 we’re asking her to give us. But, of course, there’s inflation.
My mother-in-law was married in 1974. When you put that into the BLS’ inflation calculator, you find out that $900 in 1974 dollars turns out to be $3,892 in 2009 dollars. And, if you want to be nitpicky about it, I’m certain that the percentile rank of her current household income is certainly higher than her parents’ percentile rank, and also that her inflation-adjusted expenses are much lower (she has only one child – not four, like her parents – as well as various other factors that reduce her costs).
This case is a perfect showcase for the problems of discounting inflation. In it we see how a boomer thinks she’s suffering to give us more than we deserve, when in fact she is giving us less than her parents did, even though she is “better off” than they ever were.
My future mother-in-law is just one example of not adjusting for inflation; but as you will see, it isn’t just your “average boomer” who is making this kind of error. Take my Dad, for example.
My father is an auditor for the Department of Defense. He’s also a Certified Public Accountant. My dad knows how to keep track of money, like few others. But strangely, he is no more immune to the problem of miscalculating inflation than your average lay citizen.
One of my Dad’s favorite stories is about how, when he just got out of college, he bought himself a brand new dark-green Mustang. He says he could only afford enough gas to take him to the grocery store, but he stilled loved that car. Frequently at the end of this story he does his diligence (as a good boomer) to chide his children for their frivolous lifestyles. You probably see what’s coming – further investigation into the inflation-adjusted value of a 1972 Mustang casts doubt on which generation of Lundy has self-indulged more.
The cheapest Mustang my father could have purchased in the year 1972 cost $2,679 . Plug that into the inflation calculator and we find out that in today’s dollars that equals $13,666.
Now, it’s been about 5 years since I left college. To equal my father’s Mustang purchase during my post-college years, I would have to spend around $2,733 per year in big-time-fun expenditures (not counting things like going to the movies, which I know my father did as well, and probably just as frequently). Seeing that my annual income has never been higher than $18,000 a year since leaving college (and very frequently much lower), it seems hard to believe that I would spend, at a minimum 15% of my yearly income on some fun trip or other big-time leisure expenditure. But of course, I don’t have to guess about this matter. I didn’t spend this amount. And for the few “big fun” expenditures I did make (e.g. hiking the John Muir Trail two summers ago), most of this was paid for out of my own (meager) resources, and the rest was helped out by the usual money given to me by my family for Christmas, birthday, etc.
Let me make it clear: I don’t mean to whine. I do recognize the privileged life I lead (and have led). However, as we see from these examples, taking account of inflation would probably help older generations to fully account for the privileges they also enjoyed in their childhoods, and in their current lives.
Substitution
It’s easy to see how inflation might trick someone who is looking retrospectively at the past. Without memorizing a list of inflation factors for every year since your birth, it’s hard to have a realistic sense of how much you need to adjust for changes in the nominal prices of goods. However, one of the more mystifying errors older generations commit is their lack of accounting for substitution.
Substitution is not a hard concept to grasp. When life circumstances change, people tend to buy a different “basket of goods.” So, for instance, when a couple goes from living alone to having children; their basket of goods sees a drop in movie-going expenditures, and a precipitous rise in diaper and bottle purchases.
The same principle of substitution can be loosely applied to generational changes. Kids today just aren’t into pet rocks as much as they were in the 1970’s. Conversely, the interest of today’s youth in constantly texting one another would certainly stump the kids on That 70’s Show.
Why is Substitution Accounting a Problem for Older Generations?
Discounting substitution is caused by a sampling error: older generations only see the “inexplicable” things that younger generations do buy, but not any of the things that younger generations are no longer buying.
To put it in practical terms, my parents look at my desire to buy clothes from Banana Republic with horror. All they ever wore were “cheap, worn-out Levi jeans.”
But what my parents don’t see are all the 75-RPM records and 8-track tapes I’m not buying. In fact, I don’t ever buy music. I download it from a bittorrent site. Or I hear it free from a streaming Pandora radio station. Or I hear it free from videos posted on YouTube (you get the idea).
So with all those record purchases of my parent’s youth that I’m not buying, I’m taking that money and buying what’s fashionable now. But again, it’s much harder to see something I’m not buying, than something I am buying. So my generation looks spoiled to elders, both because older people don’t like the kinds of things I buy, but also because they don’t see all the “essential costs” my generation no longer makes. *
Tune in Next Week Buckaroos…
If you want to hear more final two accounting errors, check back here next week when we’ll be discussing Diffusion and Increasing Standards.
* On a side note, I bet my parents would be happy to excuse, and possibly even subsidize, my purchasing of 75-RPM records (which would fit in with their generation’s idea of a good bohemian). And, while I’m digressing, I often wonder whether the fabled “old pair of jeans” I always hear so much about from boomers might actually have been a fashion statement of their time (rather than just some functional clothing they threw on, without care for fashion)?
June 22, 2009 at 11:33 am |
As someone whose parents ordered ill-fitting, colorfast, everwear jeans mail order from Montgomery Ward throughout a 70s childhood, I will tell you with no small emotion that I would have killed for those hip and stylish Levis. First thing I did when I started making a little money at odd jobs was discover thrift stores and start buying other people’s faded old Levis. So yes, you are on the right track here, and it’s worth also thinking about the interpretive disconnect that happens when status purchases are transformed into common sense. You’re not spoiled if Levis are just what everyone wears (except for that weirdo bumpkin over there).
June 24, 2009 at 8:55 am |
Carl, its funny that I seem to have committed one of my own errors here, in reverse. I simply took my elders at their word when they assumed that Levis are a “basic” good. You’re exactly right to point out that Levis (which now are basic, declasse items) were possibly a status good in the past (even if only a few “bumpkins” couldn’t get a hold of them).
June 22, 2009 at 1:52 pm |
Interesting post… I suggest, however, not referring your soon-to-be mother-in-law to it.
June 24, 2009 at 1:02 pm |
[...] Lundy: Why everyone younger than you is spoiled June 24, 2009 In the first of two guest posts on Budding Sociologist, Jeff Lundy discusses consumption patterns of young people. In particular, [...]
June 30, 2009 at 1:23 pm |
[...] Post: “Why Everyone Younger Than You is Spoiled” Part II Following on last week’s excellent guest post, Jeff Lundy (Sociology PhD Candidate at UCSD and visiting scholar at Michigan) completes his [...]
June 30, 2009 at 10:08 pm |
I’m surprised to read about boomers subject to money illusion. I would have that nearly everyone was cured of this during the 1970s and 1980s, and I’ve personally never heard anyone quoting a pre-1990 price for anything without an immediate observation that of course everything was cheaper then. But, I’m an economist, so I move in atypical circles
For Australia (and apparently for the US), multiply by 5 is a good rule to convert 1970s to current prices
August 5, 2009 at 12:16 pm |
John, the multiplication rule is a good one; I think having a rule like this makes it easier to figure out comparative prices in various decades.
Also, I think you’re definitely right that almost everyone is aware of inflation. I think the problem for most people is that they aren’t clear on the extent nominal prices have changed over time. Going totally on my intuition (the sort of thing one gets to do in blog posts) I would imagine that many boomers I’ve met – if put on the spot – would say that prices have only gained 150% to 250% since the 1970’s. However, as I point out in post, prices from 1974 have grown 432% (to speak coarsely of inflation).
July 8, 2009 at 3:25 pm |
Umm. 75-RPM record? What is that? Perhaps a cross between a 78 and 45?
There is no such thing.
August 5, 2009 at 12:18 pm |
Haha… I guess younger generations are no better than older ones at comprehending the youthful purchases of their counterparts.
July 21, 2009 at 1:38 am |
Spoiled rotten is an understatement. When kids consider killing parents for money or tells the parents that they have ruined their lives because they don’t own the latest and coolest clothing, what else would you call it? My brother thought he was doing something nice for his daughter when he tried to buy her a decent used car when she turned 18, it was all he could afford. She told him she should have a new car because she had a reputation to maintain.??? She hasn’t spoken to her father in three years because he didn’t buy her anything…Spoiled Rotten.
August 5, 2009 at 12:29 pm |
Hey Mark, you bring up an issue that deserves attention. I definitely don’t want to say that every young person isn’t spoiled. There’s definitely some really annoying spoiled kids out there.
On the other hand though, I should say that the phenomenon of spoiled children isn’t new. I imagine that as long as human societies have had abundance above subsistence, there have been some pretty rotten kids.
In terms of clarification, then, I guess I would say some young children today really are spoiled; but that not every young person is spoiled; and that many fewer are spoiled than you might think; and that when you see a spoiled kid, remember every generation has had their spoiled kids (and that hopefully, some of these kids will gain some sense later down the road).
August 4, 2009 at 10:02 pm |
Well thought out from a particular POV. But the other side of the coin is as valid from it’s own perspective. What you don’t spend on 45’s a year is well consumed in the initial outlay for your laptop and MP3 player plus monthly Internet charges, antivirus protection, etc… The times and technology has you comparing apples and oranges. So the economic argument is kind of a moot point. But no one could accuse a young man working on his PHD in Soc. a slacker. And if they do, tell them to call me, for your Cuz has your back.
August 5, 2009 at 1:00 pm |
Jim, it’s good to know somebody has my back.
Also, you raise such a good point, look for a final post on this subject in response.
August 27, 2009 at 1:48 pm |
I think you should not criticize your mother-in-law for offering to give you money, at any amount. It is just rude, in my opinion. When someone offers to give you money, just smile, and say thank you for their generosity.
(The smiling part is really important… to be married you are going to have to let MANY in-law irritations slide off your back. And it is seriously dumb to write about future mommy-in-law online, which ANYBODY can read.)
When I got married six years ago, I just let my mother-in-law do whatever she wanted to plan my wedding….true, I did not get a say in the details of the wedding, but because I let her be in total control, she paid for the whole thing!
I am under 30, and my mother is over 62. She graduated from school and started a business during the Carter years (think massive inflation). She has told me, many times, that those years were the worst years of her life, because of inflation and the economy. She said she was crying almost every night to keep her business afloat.
So, to say that older folks are not aware of inflation, and the pain cause by it, is naive. You are mostly judging based on anecdotal evidence.
I do not like to generalize older folks. Also, I don’t like it when older folks generalize my generation.
I think this article is mostly judging based on generalizations.
August 27, 2009 at 2:30 pm |
Hey Helen,
Thanks for giving me a great chance to offer a clarification. I do not in any way want to criticize the gift that my future mother-in-law has given me and my fiance. I am truly grateful that she has contributed so much to our wedding (at what is a sizable expense). Furthermore I am happy to accept her gift alongside any kind of comments she wants to offer with it.
In writing this post I did not hope to offend or chastise anyone, or to get revenge, or to blow off some steam about personal gripes. On the contrary, I recognize the moderate risk I take by offering personal examples on a website.
The very reason I offer these examples however, is exactly because it is these personal moments that have the best chance of resonating with readers. I think this issue is pretty important for people to consider, and that is why I offered some (possibly charged) anecdotes, in order to get people seriously considering the subject.
Finally, in response to your comment about anecdotes, most blog posts are based on anecdotes. Furthermore, I’m sure that your mother may be more understanding than most, particularly because it sounds like she had the type of experiences to give her a good perspective. For instance, unlike most people, it seems she would be especially attuned to changes in inflation.
Of course, your mother is just one person, and her experiences can only just be another anecdote.
August 27, 2009 at 1:55 pm |
Inflation (1)
1979 11.3%
1980 13.5
1981 10.3
1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, CPI-U (1982-84=100), not seasonally adjusted, table CUUR0000SA0.
August 28, 2009 at 8:48 am |
[...] Noah indicou uma excelente sequência de posts escritos por Jeff Lundy, “a PhD candidate at the University of [...]